Should we rename the 'tri' tag to 'reference implementation'?

Question

I appreciate that there needs to be a tag for the Tridion Reference Implementation.

But I highly doubt that tri is the best tag name. If the product itself was named 'tri' that would be a great tag to use. But it's not: it is named Tridion Reference Implementation (when used outside of a Tridion context) or Reference Implementation (when the Tridion context has already been established).

Can we get rid of the tri tag and just use reference-implementation?

Answer 1

Definitely not in favor of tri, doesn't seem to make much sense unless you're aware of all the TLAs, like ST, XPM, FH, TCM, CD, TDS, AM (1 & 2), OE, SE, DCP, DCT, CID, TBB, UGC, etc.

BTW, it is named SDL Tridion Reference Implementation, since the product name is SDL Tridion.

Answer 2

Fair point. Have actioned: tri is no more.